G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+430.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 75.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
❌41.2% longer card at 240mm vs 170mm.

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 240mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,682 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅+430.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 75.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 240mm, a 70mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
❌41.2% longer card at 240mm vs 170mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,682 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 560?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 3,682 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon RX 560 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017, 430.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023). That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 202.0% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 430.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 560 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon RX 560 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon RX 560 is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 3,682 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	167 FPS	41 FPS
medium	152 FPS	26 FPS
high	134 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	28 FPS
medium	114 FPS	17 FPS
high	99 FPS	10 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	10 FPS
medium	74 FPS	7 FPS
high	62 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 560

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	392 FPS	88 FPS
medium	334 FPS	58 FPS
high	268 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	25 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	42 FPS
medium	209 FPS	31 FPS
high	169 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	15 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	11 FPS
medium	98 FPS	9 FPS
high	82 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 560

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	812 FPS	166 FPS
medium	642 FPS	133 FPS
high	551 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	124 FPS
medium	443 FPS	99 FPS
high	379 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	83 FPS
medium	297 FPS	66 FPS
high	234 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 560

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
1080p
low	746 FPS	154 FPS
medium	613 FPS	119 FPS
high	536 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	110 FPS
medium	486 FPS	87 FPS
high	421 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	62 FPS
medium	308 FPS	47 FPS
high	285 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 560

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 560

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 560's 3,682 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 430.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score	19,548+431%	3,682
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072+200%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+479%	2.611 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+93%	1275 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 560 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70 C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 560
TDP	115W	75W-35%
Recommended PSU	550W	450W-18%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	240mm	170mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C	70 C-4%
Perf/Watt	170.0+246%	49.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. The Radeon RX 560 costs 66.9% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 75.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).