
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+800% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 378.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 640
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon RX 640
2019Why buy it
- ✅+800% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 378.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon RX 640?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 640 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 24 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 640

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640
The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 640's 2,172 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 800%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+800% | 2,172 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+380% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+869% | 1.559 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+102% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1775% | 0.16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+4700% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+292% | 43.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 640 costs 46.8% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 377.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $159-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+377% | 13.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #665 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












