G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 144.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon RX 6900 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
234.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon RX 6900 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 144.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Why buy it

✅37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6900 XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
234.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6900 XT better than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon RX 6900 XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 36.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6900 XT is about 234.1% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 37.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 36.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6900 XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon RX 6900 XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 6900 XT. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 6900 XT currently gives you 36.7% higher G3D Mark and 37.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6900 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	167 FPS	258 FPS
medium	152 FPS	235 FPS
high	134 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	242 FPS
medium	114 FPS	200 FPS
high	99 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	171 FPS
medium	74 FPS	143 FPS
high	62 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	392 FPS	601 FPS
medium	334 FPS	500 FPS
high	268 FPS	400 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	341 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	397 FPS
medium	209 FPS	330 FPS
high	169 FPS	271 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	221 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	193 FPS
medium	98 FPS	162 FPS
high	82 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	111 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	812 FPS	924 FPS
medium	642 FPS	767 FPS
high	551 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	585 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	714 FPS
medium	443 FPS	587 FPS
high	379 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	498 FPS
medium	297 FPS	412 FPS
high	234 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	290 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
1080p
low	746 FPS	684 FPS
medium	613 FPS	565 FPS
high	536 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	563 FPS
medium	486 FPS	471 FPS
high	421 FPS	408 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	360 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	365 FPS
medium	308 FPS	317 FPS
high	285 FPS	290 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	256 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon RX 6900 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 6900 XT

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 6900 XT

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,729 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 26,729 — the Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 36.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6900 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
G3D Mark Score	19,548	26,729+37%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3072	5120+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+9%	2250 MHz
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	96	320+233%
L1 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+500%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	80+233%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6900 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6900 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — a 88.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	512 GB/s+88%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+500%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 6900 XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon RX 6900 XT's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6900 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2.5 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon RX 6900 XT
TDP	115W-62%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W-35%	850W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-20%	2.5
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+91%	89.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6900 XT launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26.8 (Radeon RX 6900 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 144% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).