
GeForce RTX 4060

Radeon X1600 XT
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon X1600 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon X1600 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon X1600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅4861.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 11115.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon X1600 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon X1600 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon X1600 XT
The Radeon X1600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 116 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon X1600 XT's 116 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 16751.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon X1600 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1600 XT). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.04 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 XT). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2250 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 80 (Radeon X1600 XT) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon X1600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+16752% | 116 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5120+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS+52% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+9% | 2250 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 96 | 320+233% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon X1600 XT does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon X1600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 XT carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 XT. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1600 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon X1600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon X1600 XT's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon X1600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-62% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+42400% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon X1600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon X1600 XT was 33.4% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1600 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 10800% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon X1600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $199-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+10800% | 0.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #35 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














