
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅216.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅216.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 169 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 737 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 736 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 263 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1425 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,379 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 23,379 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 19.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9,728 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 41.15 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1575 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 76 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 23,379+20% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 9728+217% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 41.15 TFLOPS+172% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+56% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 96 | 304+217% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 9.5 MB+217% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 76+217% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 304+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 111.8% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 64 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 576 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile's 115W — a 0% difference. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 175W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 175W-68% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 203.3+20% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












