G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅62.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
✅Delivers 352.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
❌47.2% longer card at 240mm vs 163mm.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
✅Measures 163mm instead of 240mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
150.5% HIGHER MSRP
$749 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 80.8% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 10,814), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX A1000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and 24 vs 18 ray-tracing units. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $450 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $749, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 352.8% (65.4 vs 14.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 80.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 72.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score	19,548+81%	10,814
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3072+33%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+124%	6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+68%	1462 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+33%	72
L1 Cache	3 MB+30%	2.3 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+33%	18
Tensor Cores	96+33%	72

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A1000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
TDP	115W	50W-57%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	163mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-3%	75°C
Perf/Watt	170.0	216.3+27%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 60.1% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 354.2% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A1000
MSRP	$299-60%	$749
Performance per Dollar	65.4+354%	14.4
Codename	AD107	GA107
Release	May 18 2023	April 16 2024
Ranking	#84	#251

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.