
GeForce RTX 4060

RTX A2000 12GB
GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A2000 12GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A2000 12GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A2000 12GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌50.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs RTX A2000 12GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 13,721 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 42.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 96 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+42% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3328+8% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+89% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+105% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 104+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3.3 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 26+8% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 104+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A2000 12GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A2000 12GB supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 12GB. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 196.0+15% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 33.4% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 113.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-33% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+114% | 30.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #177 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














