
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅34.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.2% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX A2000 12GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A2000 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A2000 12GB

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 13,721 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 42.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26 (RTX A2000 12GB) with 96 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+42% | 13,721 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3328+8% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+89% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+105% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 104+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3.3 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 26+8% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 104+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 12GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A2000 12GB supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 196.0+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 33.4% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 113.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-33% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+114% | 30.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA106 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












