G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+105.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,506 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

RTX A2000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅+105.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,506 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX A2000 Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 9,506 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while RTX A2000 Mobile is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 105.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 105.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is RTX A2000 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX A2000 Mobile is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
1080p
low	167 FPS	111 FPS
medium	152 FPS	94 FPS
high	134 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	47 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	96 FPS
medium	114 FPS	82 FPS
high	99 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	31 FPS
medium	74 FPS	29 FPS
high	62 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX A2000 Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
1080p
low	392 FPS	240 FPS
medium	334 FPS	202 FPS
high	268 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	170 FPS
medium	209 FPS	141 FPS
high	169 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	99 FPS
medium	98 FPS	80 FPS
high	82 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX A2000 Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
1080p
low	812 FPS	428 FPS
medium	642 FPS	342 FPS
high	551 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	214 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	321 FPS
medium	443 FPS	257 FPS
high	379 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	160 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	214 FPS
medium	297 FPS	171 FPS
high	234 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	107 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX A2000 Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
1080p
low	746 FPS	181 FPS
medium	613 FPS	148 FPS
high	536 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	128 FPS
medium	486 FPS	106 FPS
high	421 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	73 FPS
medium	308 FPS	61 FPS
high	285 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open RTX A2000 Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX A2000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX A2000 Mobile

The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 9,506 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 105.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1687 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	19,548+106%	9,506
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3072+20%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+75%	8.637 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+46%	1687 MHz
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	3 MB+20%	2.5 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+20%	20
Tensor Cores	96+20%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A2000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A2000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 19% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RTX A2000 Mobile
TDP	115W	95W-17%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+70%	100.1