
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅23.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅8.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (104 vs 96).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 104), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 16,940 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 15.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1657 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 26 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+15% | 16,940 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3328+8% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+37% | 11.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+48% | 1657 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 104+8% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3.3 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 26+8% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 104+8% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 32 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 87.5% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 45W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 376.4+121% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | GB206 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #84 | #156 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












