
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,266 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1205.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 600W, a 485W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅85.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅683.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2764.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌421.7% higher power demand at 600W vs 115W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,266 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1205.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 600W, a 485W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅85.0% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅683.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2764.5% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌421.7% higher power demand at 600W vs 115W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than RTX PRO 6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 283 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 119.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 42,899+119% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 24064+683% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+666% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+2% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 96 | 752+683% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 23.5 MB+683% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 128 MB+433% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 188+683% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 752+683% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 252.9% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 960 GB/s+253% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 128 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 135.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-81% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+138% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 96.5% less ($8266 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1208% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-97% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1208% | 5.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | GB202 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #84 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












