
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1396.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,190 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27377.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M2070-Q
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,306 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1735.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Tesla M2070-Q
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1396.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,190 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27377.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,306 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌1735.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,489 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Tesla M2070-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M2070-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Tesla M2070-Q

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Tesla M2070-Q
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 1,306 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1396.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1397% | 1,306 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+586% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1370% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+241% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+3100% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M2070-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M2070-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+3100% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+2831% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 94.6% less ($5190 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.2 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 32600% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-95% | $5489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+32600% | 0.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | GF100 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #84 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












