G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+1296.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11574.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,400 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
736.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1296.3% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla M2090 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,201 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 11574.6% (65.4 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Tesla M2090's 1,400 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1296.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	19,548+1296%	1,400
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	3072+500%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+1034%	1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+3100%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla M2090 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2090 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+3100%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL 11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	—
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	—
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	CUDA,OpenCL

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 248mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
TDP	115W-54%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	248mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+2936%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 88% cheaper ($2201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 10800% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$299-88%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	65.4+10800%	0.6
Codename	AD107	GF110
Release	May 18 2023	July 25 2011
Ranking	#84	#530

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.