
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+83.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1128.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅+83.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1128.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 10,641 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 83.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+84% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+121% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+121% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+173% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+299% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1134% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1134% | 5.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM200 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












