GeForce RTX 4060
Titan X Pascal
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅10.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 473.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌301% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Titan X Pascal's 13,660 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 43.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+43% | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+38% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+61% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 224+133% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+131% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Titan X Pascal does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Titan X Pascal leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 76.5% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 480 GB/s+76% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+700% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-54% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+211% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 75.1% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 473.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-75% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+474% | 11.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #84 | #198 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Titan X Pascal
