
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 280).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (29,964 vs 32,587).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.2% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 43.5 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 33.3 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $900 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅14.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 280).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (280 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (29,964 vs 32,587).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.2% HIGHER MSRP$900 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.3 vs 43.5 G3D/$ ($900 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 Ti better than Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 583 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 939 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 670 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 727 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 506 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 202 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 889 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 769 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 680 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 486 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 32,587 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 29,964 — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti leads by 8.8%. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2452 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 40 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) with 280 Tensor cores vs 320.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,587+9% | 29,964 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960+250% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 43.94 TFLOPS+450% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz+57% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 280+75% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB+252% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70+75% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 320+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti draws 300W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 88 C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 110W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 0mm |
| Height | 137mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 88 C | 75°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.6 | 272.4+151% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti launched at $749 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti costs 16.8% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.5 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 33.3 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 30.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-17% | $900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.5+31% | 33.3 |
| Codename | GB203 | TU104 |
| Release | February 20 2025 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #9 | #201 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












