
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
2025Why buy it
- ✅21.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.5 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌82% longer card at 304mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
2025Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 304mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌166.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 43.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2295 MHz to 2452 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 32,587 points. Launch price was $749.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 32,587 versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 30,020 — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti leads by 8.6%. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 8,960 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 43.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2452 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 70 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 280 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 32,587+9% | 30,020 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8960 | 8960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 43.94 TFLOPS+71% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz+71% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 280 | 280 |
| L1 Cache | 8.8 MB | 8.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 70 |
| Tensor Cores | 280 | 280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition carries 24 GB. RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 24 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti draws 300W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 304mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 88 C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 70W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 304mm | 167mm |
| Height | 137mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 88 C | 72°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 108.6 | 428.9+295% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti came in at $749, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti was 62.5% cheaper ($1250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.5 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti) vs 15.0 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti offers 190% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $749-63% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.5+190% | 15.0 |
| Codename | GB203 | GB203 |
| Release | February 20 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #9 | #17 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














