
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is positioned at rank #222 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST.
| Insight | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $75), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 46.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+46.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) and GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 134W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,415 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) scores 3,500 and the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST reaches 3,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500+2% | 3,415 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1033 MHz+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST).
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST's 134W — a 126.8% difference. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 97°C.
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-78% | 134W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-23% | 97°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.7+358% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST launched at $169 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.7 (Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5)) vs 68.3 (GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST) — the GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST offers 46.3% better value. The Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Maxwell GPU Surface Book (940M, GDDR5) | GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-11% | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $75 | $50-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.7 | 68.3+46% |
| Codename | Surface Book | GK106 |
| Release | October 1 2015 | March 26 2013 |
| Ranking | #782 | #551 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















