Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE Performance Spectrum

Microsoft SQ1

8 / 8

6,039

+1.4%

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

4 / 4

5,955

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Microsoft SQ1

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 60.2 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

2018

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 198.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.2 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Microsoft SQ1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (5,955 vs 6,039).

Quick Answers

So, is Microsoft SQ1 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE?

Yes. Microsoft SQ1 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Microsoft SQ1 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Microsoft SQ1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Microsoft SQ1 is still the better call for a fresh build. Microsoft SQ1 comes in 203.0% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 5,955 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Microsoft SQ1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Microsoft SQ1

The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,955 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Microsoft SQ1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Microsoft SQ1 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE. The Microsoft SQ1 uses the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Microsoft SQ1 scores 6,039 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE's 5,955 — a 1.4% lead for the Microsoft SQ1. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE.

Feature	Microsoft SQ1	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	6,039+1%	5,955

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Microsoft SQ1 was priced at $300, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE came in at $99. On launch pricing ($300 vs $99), Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE was $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Microsoft SQ1 delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 60.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE the 99.7% better value option.

Feature	Microsoft SQ1	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
MSRP	$300	$99-67%
Performance per Dollar	20.1	60.2+200%
Release Date	2019	2018

Search Microsoft SQ1 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.