Microsoft SQ1 vs Xeon E5-2440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Xeon E5-2440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Xeon E5-2440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Microsoft SQ1

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $428 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).
✅Delivers 140.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $728 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,039 vs 6,091).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2440, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.

Xeon E5-2440

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+650% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Microsoft SQ1 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($728 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Microsoft SQ1 better than Xeon E5-2440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Microsoft SQ1 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 650% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Microsoft SQ1 is the better buy right now. Microsoft SQ1 comes in $428 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $728 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2440 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 140.6% better value on MSRP (20.1 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Microsoft SQ1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Microsoft SQ1 vs Xeon E5-2440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Microsoft SQ1

The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): + 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2440

The Xeon E5-2440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,091 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Microsoft SQ1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Microsoft SQ1 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Microsoft SQ1. The Microsoft SQ1 uses the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Microsoft SQ1 scores 6,039 against the Xeon E5-2440's 6,091 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2440. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440.

Feature	Microsoft SQ1	Xeon E5-2440
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	15360 kB (total)+650%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	6,039	6,091

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Microsoft SQ1 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-2440 came in at $728. On launch pricing ($300 vs $728), Microsoft SQ1 was $428 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Microsoft SQ1 delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2440 — making the Microsoft SQ1 the 82.6% better value option.

Feature	Microsoft SQ1	Xeon E5-2440
MSRP	$300-59%	$728
Performance per Dollar	20.1+139%	8.4
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Microsoft SQ1 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.