
Microsoft SQ1

Ryzen 7 5700X
Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Microsoft SQ1
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (6,039 vs 26,609).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +107.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- β Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β Delivers 342.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Microsoft SQ1?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Microsoft SQ1 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Microsoft SQ1
The Microsoft SQ1 is manufactured by Microsoft. It was released in 2 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): +Β 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 6,039 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Microsoft SQ1 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Microsoft SQ1 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X β a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Microsoft SQ1 uses the Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Microsoft SQ1 scores 6,039 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 β a 126% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Microsoft SQ1 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Microsoft SQ1 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | β | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | β | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 6,039 | 26,609+341% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,715 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Microsoft SQ1) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Microsoft SQ1 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Microsoft SQ1 was priced at $300, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($300 vs $299), Ryzen 7 5700X was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Microsoft SQ1 delivers 20.1 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X β making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 126.2% better value option.
| Feature | Microsoft SQ1 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.1 | 89.0+343% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














