MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000.

Insight	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 scores 4 and the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 reaches 4 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is built on TeraScale 2 while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	4	4
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.4 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX	8.1	8.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.4	1.4
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: MPEG-2 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Encoder	N/A	N/A
Decoder	MPEG-2	MPEG-2
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 draws 10W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

Feature	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP	10W	10W
Recommended PSU	0W	0W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70	70
Perf/Watt	0.4	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 0% better value.