
Mobility Radeon HD 3870

Quadro FX 2700
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 vs Quadro FX 2700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 vs Quadro FX 2700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 vs Quadro FX 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Mobility Radeon HD 3870
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌29% HIGHER MSRP$129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quadro FX 2700
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 vs Quadro FX 2700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 3870
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 548 points.

Quadro FX 2700
The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 scores 548 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 2700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870) vs 240 (Quadro FX 2700). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 3870) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2700).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 548 | 543 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.12 TFLOPS+80% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 2700 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2700.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 3870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 3870) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-74% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.0+279% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 3870 came in at $129, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100. On MSRP, Quadro FX 2700 was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.2 (Mobility Radeon HD 3870) vs 5.4 (Quadro FX 2700) — the Quadro FX 2700 offers 28.6% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 3870 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 3870 | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $100-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.2 | 5.4+29% |
| Codename | Broadway | GT200B |
| Release | January 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #846 | #815 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














