Mobility Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 1700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

2010

Why buy it

✅+9.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1458.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (216 vs 236).
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1326.5% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 4.8 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 9.3% in PassMark G3D (236 vs 216), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1458.6% (4.8 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 5470

The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 236 points.

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 scores 236 versus the Quadro FX 1700's 216 — the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 leads by 9.3%. The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score	236+9%	216
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
DirectX	11.0+10%	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	4.7+327%	1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 5470 was 93% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.8 (Mobility Radeon HD 5470) vs 0.3 (Quadro FX 1700) — the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 offers 1500% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 5470 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 5470	Quadro FX 1700
MSRP	$49-93%	$699
Performance per Dollar	4.8+1500%	0.3
Codename	Broadway	GT200B
Release	January 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#846	#815

Search Mobility Radeon HD 5470 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.