Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
VS
Quadro FX 1700

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 vs Quadro FX 1700

AMD

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

2010Core: 700 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 is positioned at rank 676 and the Quadro FX 1700 is on rank 395, so the Quadro FX 1700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

#666
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7592%
#668
6883%
#669
6864%
#673
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6242%
#674
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6199%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#677
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#678
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
99%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#680
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#681
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
95%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
94%
#683
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
90%
#684
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
90%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
85%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
80%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
77%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
74%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
73%
#691
GeForce 9800 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $75
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700

#380
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
47655%
#395
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
100%
#396
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
97%
#397
Quadro FX 540
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
87%
#398
Tesla M2070-Q
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50
77%
#399
Quadro FX 1500
MSRP: $699|Avg: $30
77%
#400
Quadro 7000
MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300
77%
#401
Quadro FX 3700
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500
74%
#402
Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15
74%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
71%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
65%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
65%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
58%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
55%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
52%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon. HD 5470.

InsightMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $500), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1890.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1890.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 and Quadro FX 1700

AMD

Mobility Radeon. HD 5470

The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 215 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700

The Quadro FX 1700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 216 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 scores 215 and the Quadro FX 1700 reaches 216 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 1700 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon. HD 5470) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon. HD 5470) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700).

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
G3D Mark Score
215
216
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+80%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Mobility Radeon. HD 5470) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 1700). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
DirectX
11.0+10%
10_0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1700's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon. HD 5470) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.3+291%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Quadro FX 1700 launched at $699 and now averages $500. The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 costs 95% less ($475 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.6 (Mobility Radeon. HD 5470) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 1700) — the Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 offers 2050% better value. The Mobility Radeon. HD 5470 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon. HD 5470Quadro FX 1700
MSRP
$150-79%
$699
Avg Price (30d)
$25-95%
$500
Performance per Dollar
8.6+2050%
0.4
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#815