Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs Quadro FX 570

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 550v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs Quadro FX 570 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs Quadro FX 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 550v

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 318.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 570

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 306.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 550v is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (266 vs 258), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Mobility Radeon HD 550v is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 40nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 550v makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 318.7% (5.4 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs Quadro FX 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 550v

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 266 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v scores 266 and the Quadro FX 570 reaches 258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 550v is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 570 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 550v) vs 240 (Quadro FX 570). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 550v) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 550vQuadro FX 570
G3D Mark Score
266+3%
258
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
800+233%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS+80%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
80+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 550vQuadro FX 570
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 570 carries 256 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 550v gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 550v and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 570.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 550vQuadro FX 570
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 550v draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 570's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 550v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 550v) vs 350W (Quadro FX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 550vQuadro FX 570
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
5.3+279%
1.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 550v came in at $49, while the Quadro FX 570 launched at $199. On MSRP, Mobility Radeon HD 550v was 75.4% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 550v) vs 1.3 (Quadro FX 570) — the Mobility Radeon HD 550v offers 315.4% better value. The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 550v (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 550vQuadro FX 570
MSRP
$49-75%
$199
Performance per Dollar
5.4+315%
1.3
Codename
Broadway
GT200B
Release
January 7 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#846
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.