N200 vs Core i7-2960XM

CPU

GPU

N200

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Core i7-2960XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

N200

4 / 4

4,729

+0.4%

4,709

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The N200 is positioned at rank 137 and the Core i7-2960XM is on rank 60, so the Core i7-2960XM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar N200

#36

Core i5-11500B

MSRP: $185|Avg: $185

98%

#125

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

310%

#126

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

306%

#127

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

281%

#128

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

279%

#129

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

277%

#131

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

267%

#132

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

256%

#133

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

256%

#134

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

249%

#137

N200

MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A

100%

#138

Core 2 Duo SP9600

MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A

100%

#140

Core 2 Duo P8700

MSRP: $241|Avg: $85

99%

#147

Atom N2800

MSRP: $47|Avg: $3

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2960XM

#13

Ryzen 3 210

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

99%

#14

Ryzen 5 PRO 230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#15

Ryzen 5 220

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#48

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

218%

#49

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

215%

#50

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

197%

#51

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

196%

#52

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

195%

#54

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

188%

#55

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

180%

#56

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

180%

#57

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

175%

#60

Core i7-2960XM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#65

Core i5-3320M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#66

Core i7-4510U

MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A

98%

#69

Core 2 Quad Q9100

MSRP: $14|Avg: $14

96%

#75

Core i3-4030U

MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The N200 (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	N200	Core i7-2960XM
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($193)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Legacy / Intel 7 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2960XM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	N200	Core i7-2960XM
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($193)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

N200 Benchmark Check

Core i7-2960XM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of N200 and Core i7-2960XM

N200

The N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,729 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-2960XM

The Core i7-2960XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,709 points. Launch price was $1,096.

⚡

Processing Power

The N200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2960XM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the N200 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-2960XM — identical boost frequencies. The Core i7-2960XM is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the N200 scores 4,729 against the Core i7-2960XM's 4,709 — a 0.4% lead for the N200. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N200 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2960XM.

Feature	N200	Core i7-2960XM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,729	4,709

🧠

Memory & Platform

The N200 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-2960XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	N200	Core i7-2960XM
Socket	FCBGA1264	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (N200) / true (Core i7-2960XM). The Core i7-2960XM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the N200 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2960XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.