
Opteron 150 vs Athlon 64 3500+

Opteron 150

Athlon 64 3500+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 150 is positioned at rank 726 and the Athlon 64 3500+ is on rank 1102, so the Opteron 150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Opteron 150
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3500+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Opteron 150 | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Venus (2004−2005) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Opteron 150 | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 150 and Athlon 64 3500+

Opteron 150
The Opteron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $800.

Athlon 64 3500+
The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.
Processing Power
Both the Opteron 150 and Athlon 64 3500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 150 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 3500+ — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 150. The Opteron 150 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 3500+ uses San Diego (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 150 scores 585 against the Athlon 64 3500+'s 570 — a 2.6% lead for the Opteron 150. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Opteron 150 | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+9% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Venus (2004−2005) | San Diego (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 585+3% | 570 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the 939 socket with PCIe 2.0.
| Feature | Opteron 150 | Athlon 64 3500+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















