Opteron 154 vs Pentium SU4100

Opteron 154 vs Pentium SU4100 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 154

1 / 1

655

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU4100

2 / 2

685

+4.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 154 vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 154 vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 154

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium SU4100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (655 vs 685).
❌940% higher power demand at 104W vs 10W.

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 104W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Opteron 154 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium SU4100 better than Opteron 154?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 154 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium SU4100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium SU4100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium SU4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium SU4100 is the better buy right now. Pentium SU4100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $289 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium SU4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 154 vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 154

The Opteron 154 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Venus (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 655 points. Launch price was $800.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 154 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium SU4100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium SU4100 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Opteron 154 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU4100 — a 73.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 154 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Opteron 154 uses the Venus (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Pentium SU4100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 154 scores 655 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 4.5% lead for the Pentium SU4100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Opteron 154	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+115%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+115%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Venus (2004−2005)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	655	685+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 154 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.