Opteron 250
VS
Athlon 64 3700+

Opteron 250 vs Athlon 64 3700+

AMD

Opteron 250

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 3700+

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 250 is positioned at rank 700 and the Athlon 64 3700+ is on rank 1099, so the Opteron 250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 250

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13408%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2532%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2249%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1738%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
99%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
98%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
97%
#700
Opteron 250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#702
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#704
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#707
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 3700+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
136120%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
128620%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
93389%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
28134%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
22285%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
19495%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11166%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11020%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10034%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10033%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
9921%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9653%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9518%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9480%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9394%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
100%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
98%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
94%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
92%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
86%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
84%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
81%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
80%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
78%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
73%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
69%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
64%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
63%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
61%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
55%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
55%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Athlon 64 3700+ shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightOpteron 250Athlon 64 3700+
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (SledgeHammer (2003−2005) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (San Diego (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 250Athlon 64 3700+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 250 and Athlon 64 3700+

AMD

Opteron 250

The Opteron 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 620 points. Launch price was $12.

AMD

Athlon 64 3700+

The Athlon 64 3700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 622 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Opteron 250 and Athlon 64 3700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Opteron 250 versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3700+ — identical boost frequencies. The Opteron 250 uses the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture (130 nm), while the Athlon 64 3700+ uses San Diego (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 250 scores 620 against the Athlon 64 3700+'s 622 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 3700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureOpteron 250Athlon 64 3700+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
San Diego (2001−2005)
PassMark
620
622
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 250 uses the 940 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 3700+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 250Athlon 64 3700+
Socket
940
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0