Opteron 3260 HE
VS
Core 2 Duo T7500

Opteron 3260 HE vs Core 2 Duo T7500

AMD

Opteron 3260 HE

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7500

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Opteron 3260 HE is positioned at rank 214 and the Core 2 Duo T7500 is on rank 88, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3260 HE

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3641%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
687%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
611%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
472%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
99%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
99%
#196
Xeon 6515P
MSRP: $740|Avg: $886
96%
#214
Opteron 3260 HE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#76
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
254%
#77
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
251%
#78
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
230%
#79
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
229%
#80
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
227%
#82
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
219%
#83
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
210%
#84
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
210%
#85
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
204%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
100%
#98
N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128
94%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Opteron 3260 HE leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T7500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightOpteron 3260 HECore 2 Duo T7500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zurich (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightOpteron 3260 HECore 2 Duo T7500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 3260 HE and Core 2 Duo T7500

AMD

Opteron 3260 HE

The Opteron 3260 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zurich (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $125.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.

Processing Power

The Opteron 3260 HE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Opteron 3260 HE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Opteron 3260 HE versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — a 50.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 3260 HE (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Opteron 3260 HE uses the Zurich (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 3260 HE scores 2,283 against the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2,308 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7500. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Opteron 3260 HE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500.

FeatureOpteron 3260 HECore 2 Duo T7500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+68%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+23%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Zurich (2012)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,283
2,308+1%
Geekbench 6 Multi
507
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 3260 HE uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 3260 HECore 2 Duo T7500
Socket
AM3+
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 3260 HE) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureOpteron 3260 HECore 2 Duo T7500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget