Opteron 6212
VS
Celeron N5095

Opteron 6212 vs Celeron N5095

AMD

Opteron 6212

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron N5095

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 6212 is positioned at rank #88 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6212

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2092%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
395%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
351%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
271%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
99%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
88%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
85%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
100%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N5095 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 6212Celeron N5095
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($266)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6212 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 6212Celeron N5095
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($266)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6212 and Celeron N5095

AMD

Opteron 6212

The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.

Intel

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6212 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Celeron N5095 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6212 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 6212 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6212 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N5095 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6212 scores 3,973 against the Celeron N5095's 4,013 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N5095. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N5095.

FeatureOpteron 6212Celeron N5095
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+10%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+30%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+33%
1.5 MB
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Interlagos (2011−2012)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
3,973
4,013+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6212 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N5095 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6212Celeron N5095
Socket
G34
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%