Opteron 6234
VS
Celeron N5095A

Opteron 6234 vs Celeron N5095A

AMD

Opteron 6234

12 Cores12 Thrd115 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron N5095A

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Opteron 6234 is positioned at rank #85 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6234

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2041%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
385%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
342%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
265%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
99%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
97%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
86%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
83%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
100%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
100%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
98%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N5095A (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightOpteron 6234Celeron N5095A
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($141)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6234 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightOpteron 6234Celeron N5095A
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($141)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6234 and Celeron N5095A

AMD

Opteron 6234

The Opteron 6234 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,072 points. Launch price was $377.

Intel

Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,054 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Opteron 6234 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Celeron N5095A offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 6234 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Opteron 6234 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095A — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Opteron 6234 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Opteron 6234 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N5095A uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6234 scores 4,072 against the Celeron N5095A's 4,054 — a 0.4% lead for the Opteron 6234. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6234 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N5095A.

FeatureOpteron 6234Celeron N5095A
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+200%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)+33%
1.5 MB
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Interlagos (2011−2012)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
4,072
4,054
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6234 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N5095A uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureOpteron 6234Celeron N5095A
Socket
G34
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%