Pentium 3556U
VS
Celeron N2815

Pentium 3556U vs Celeron N2815

Intel

Pentium 3556U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron N2815

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 3556U is positioned at rank 253 and the Celeron N2815 is on rank 405, so the Pentium 3556U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3556U

#241
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
411%
#242
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
405%
#243
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
371%
#244
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
370%
#245
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
366%
#247
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
354%
#248
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
339%
#249
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
339%
#250
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
330%
#253
Pentium 3556U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2815

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
98%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#393
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
549%
#394
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
541%
#395
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
497%
#396
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
495%
#397
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
490%
#399
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
473%
#400
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
454%
#401
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
453%
#402
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
441%
#405
Celeron N2815
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2815 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3556U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 3556UCeleron N2815
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 3556UCeleron N2815
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 3556U and Celeron N2815

Intel

Pentium 3556U

The Pentium 3556U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,072 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2815

The Celeron N2815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,068 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 3556U and Celeron N2815 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3556U versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron N2815 — a 22.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N2815 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Pentium 3556U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2815 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 3556U scores 1,072 against the Celeron N2815's 1,068 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium 3556U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3556U vs 1 MB on the Celeron N2815.

FeaturePentium 3556UCeleron N2815
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
2.13 GHz+25%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
1.86 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
1 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,072
1,068
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 3556U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2815 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 3556UCeleron N2815
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 3556U) / true (Celeron N2815). The Celeron N2815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium 3556U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2815 rivals AMD A4-1250.

FeaturePentium 3556UCeleron N2815
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true