Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Pentium 4 2.60 vs Sempron 3000+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Pentium 4 2.60

1 Cores1 Thrd92 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2002
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Sempron 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Pentium 4 2.60 vs Sempron 3000+ Performance Spectrum

Pentium 4 2.60
1 / 1
365
+4.3%
brand logoAtom Z515
brand logoPentium III 1400S
brand logoAtom E660
brand logoCeleron 220
brand logoCore i5-12500
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
Sempron 3000+
1 / 1
350
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2100+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5655G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 4 2.60 vs Sempron 3000+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Pentium 4 2.60
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
1080P
Sempron 3000+
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Pentium 4 2.60 vs Sempron 3000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 4 2.60

2002

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $401 MSRP, while Sempron 3000+ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • ❌48.4% higher power demand at 92W vs 62W.

    Sempron 3000+

    2005

    Why buy it

    • ✅Draws 62W instead of 92W, a 30W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (350 vs 365).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium 4 2.60 better than Sempron 3000+?
    Yes. Pentium 4 2.60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 2.60 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 44.4% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 2.60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium 4 2.60 is the better buy right now. Pentium 4 2.60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $401 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.3% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (0.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Sempron 3000+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2002). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Pentium 4 2.60 vs Sempron 3000+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.60

    The Pentium 4 2.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 92 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Sempron 3000+

    The Sempron 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 350 points. Launch price was $50.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium 4 2.60 and Sempron 3000+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.60 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3000+ — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.60. The Pentium 4 2.60 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3000+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4 2.60 scores 365 against the Sempron 3000+'s 350 — a 4.2% lead for the Pentium 4 2.60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium 4 2.60Sempron 3000+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.6 GHz+44%
    1.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+300%
    128 kB
    Process
    130 nm
    130 nm
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    Palermo (2001−2005)
    PassMark
    365+4%
    350
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Pentium 4 2.60 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3000+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePentium 4 2.60Sempron 3000+
    Socket
    PGA478
    939
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%