Pentium 4405Y
VS
Core i3-380UM

Pentium 4405Y vs Core i3-380UM

Intel

Pentium 4405Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-380UM

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 4405Y is positioned at rank 910 and the Core i3-380UM is on rank 225, so the Core i3-380UM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4405Y

#898
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1575%
#899
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1552%
#900
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1425%
#901
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1418%
#902
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1405%
#904
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1357%
#905
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1301%
#906
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1299%
#907
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1264%
#910
Pentium 4405Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
98%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-380UM

#213
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#214
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#215
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
353%
#216
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#217
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#219
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#220
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#221
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
322%
#222
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#225
Core i3-380UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 4405Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-380UM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium 4405YCore i3-380UM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium 4405YCore i3-380UM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 4405Y and Core i3-380UM

Intel

Pentium 4405Y

The Pentium 4405Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,490 points. Launch price was $161.

Intel

Core i3-380UM

The Core i3-380UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,502 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 4405Y and Core i3-380UM share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Pentium 4405Y versus 0.03 GHz on the Core i3-380UM — a 192.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4405Y (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Pentium 4405Y uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-380UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4405Y scores 1,490 against the Core i3-380UM's 1,502 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-380UM. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium 4405Y vs 3 MB on the Core i3-380UM.

FeaturePentium 4405YCore i3-380UM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz+4900%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz+13%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,490
1,502
Geekbench 6 Single
199
Geekbench 6 Multi
451
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 4405Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-380UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 4405YCore i3-380UM
Socket
FCBGA1515
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 4405Y) / No (Core i3-380UM). The Core i3-380UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium 4405Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380UM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-380UM rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeaturePentium 4405YCore i3-380UM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget