Pentium 4425Y vs Xeon 5160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium 4425Y vs Xeon 5160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium 4425Y vs Xeon 5160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium 4425Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 80W, a 74W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 5160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,699 vs 1,715).

Xeon 5160

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 5160 better than Pentium 4425Y?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5160 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Pentium 4425Y is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 5160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 5160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 5160 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 5160 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 4425Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Pentium 4425Y vs Xeon 5160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium 4425Y

The Pentium 4425Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,699 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon 5160

The Xeon 5160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,715 points. Launch price was $22.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 4425Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon 5160's 2 cores. The Pentium 4425Y uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 5160 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 4425Y scores 1,699 against the Xeon 5160's 1,715 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon 5160. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Pentium 4425Y vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5160.

Feature	Pentium 4425Y	Xeon 5160
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	4 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,699	1,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 4425Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5160 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.