Pentium 8500
VS
Celeron N2910

Pentium 8500 vs Celeron N2910

Intel

Pentium 8500

5 Cores6 Thrd9 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Celeron N2910

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 8500 is positioned at rank 991 and the Celeron N2910 is on rank 833, so the Celeron N2910 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 8500

#979
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2023%
#980
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1994%
#981
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1830%
#982
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1822%
#983
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1805%
#985
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1743%
#986
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1672%
#987
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1669%
#988
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1624%
#991
Pentium 8500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#992
A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16
100%
#994
Core i7-4700EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $180
99%
#995
Core i3-8145UE
MSRP: $281|Avg: $50
99%
#996
Core i7-4712MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $60
97%
#997
Core i7-3615QE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $100
97%
#998
Celeron M U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#999
3015Ce
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#1000
Core i7-4700MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
96%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2910

#821
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1332%
#822
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1313%
#823
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1205%
#824
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1200%
#825
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1189%
#827
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1148%
#828
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1101%
#829
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1099%
#830
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1069%
#833
Celeron N2910
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium 8500 (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium 8500Celeron N2910
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron N2910 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium 8500Celeron N2910
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 8500 and Celeron N2910

Intel

Pentium 8500

The Pentium 8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1781. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium 8500 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Celeron N2910 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium 8500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Pentium 8500 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 — a 93.3% clock advantage for the Pentium 8500 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium 8500 uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Celeron N2910 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 8500 scores 2,900 against the Celeron N2910's 2,907 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N2910. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,250 vs 210, a 142.5% lead for the Pentium 8500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,100 vs 700 (100% advantage for the Pentium 8500). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Pentium 8500 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2910.

FeaturePentium 8500Celeron N2910
Cores / Threads
5 / 6+25%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+175%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1 GHz
1.6 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-U (2022)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,900
2,907
Geekbench 6 Single
1,250+495%
210
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,100+200%
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 8500 uses the FCBGA1781 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Celeron N2910 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5-5200 on the Pentium 8500 versus DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 — the Pentium 8500 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 8500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 14 (Pentium 8500) vs 4 (Celeron N2910) — the Pentium 8500 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Pentium 8500) and SoC (Celeron N2910).

FeaturePentium 8500Celeron N2910
Socket
FCBGA1781
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-5200+67%
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+700%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14+250%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium 8500) vs VT-x (Celeron N2910). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (48 EU) (Pentium 8500) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium 8500 targets Entry Level Laptop, Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210.

FeaturePentium 8500Celeron N2910
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (48 EU)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop
Budget Laptop