Pentium 977
VS
Celeron E3300

Pentium 977 vs Celeron E3300

Intel

Pentium 977

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron E3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium 977 is positioned at rank 1117 and the Celeron E3300 is on rank 724, so the Celeron E3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 977

#1105
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3424%
#1106
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3373%
#1107
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3097%
#1108
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3083%
#1109
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3055%
#1111
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2950%
#1112
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2828%
#1113
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2824%
#1114
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2748%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
99%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13494%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2209%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1933%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1107%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1092%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
995%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
995%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
984%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
957%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
944%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
940%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
931%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
100%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
100%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
100%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
99%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
99%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
98%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
97%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron E3300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium 977 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium 977Celeron E3300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron E3300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($10 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium 977Celeron E3300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium 977 and Celeron E3300

Intel

Pentium 977

The Pentium 977 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,148 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium 977 and Celeron E3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Pentium 977 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Pentium 977 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E3300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium 977 scores 1,148 against the Celeron E3300's 1,155 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron E3300. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 977 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3300.

FeaturePentium 977Celeron E3300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+79%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+79%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,148
1,155
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium 977 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium 977Celeron E3300
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium 977) / VT-x (Celeron E3300). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeaturePentium 977Celeron E3300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium 977 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Celeron E3300 debuted at $50. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron E3300 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium 977 delivers 114.8 pts/$ vs 115.5 pts/$ for the Celeron E3300 — making the Celeron E3300 the 0.6% better value option.

FeaturePentium 977Celeron E3300
MSRP
$134
$50-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
114.8
115.5
Release Date
2012
2009