Pentium A1018 vs Celeron G465
Pentium A1018
Celeron G465
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium A1018 is positioned at rank 1105 and the Celeron G465 is on rank 867, so the Celeron G465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium A1018
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+147%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium A1018 and Celeron G465
Pentium A1018
The Pentium A1018 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,188 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron G465
The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Pentium A1018 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G465 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium A1018 has 1 more core. The Celeron G465 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium A1018 scores 1,188 against the Celeron G465's 1,185 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium A1018. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium A1018 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465.
| Feature | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+11% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 1.5 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | — | 256 kB |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | — | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,188 | 1,185 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 300 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium A1018 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G465 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium A1018) / VT-x (Celeron G465). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium A1018 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium A1018 launched at $132 MSRP, while the Celeron G465 debuted at $70. At current prices ($15 vs $37), the Pentium A1018 is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium A1018 delivers 79.2 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G465 — making the Pentium A1018 the 84.8% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium A1018 | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $132 | $70-47% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-59% | $37 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.2+148% | 32.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium A1018 and Celeron G465
