Pentium B960
VS
Athlon II X2 215

Pentium B960 vs Athlon II X2 215

Intel

Pentium B960

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 215

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium B960 is positioned at rank 1144 and the Athlon II X2 215 is on rank 739, so the Athlon II X2 215 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium B960

#1132
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3861%
#1133
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3804%
#1134
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3492%
#1135
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3476%
#1136
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3444%
#1138
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3326%
#1139
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3189%
#1140
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3184%
#1141
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3099%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 215

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13872%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13108%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9518%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2867%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2271%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1987%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1138%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1123%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1023%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1023%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1011%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
984%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
970%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
966%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
957%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
100%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
99%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
98%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
98%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
98%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
97%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
97%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium B960 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II X2 215 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium B960Athlon II X2 215
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Athlon II X2 215 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 49% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium B960.
InsightPentium B960Athlon II X2 215
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+49%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium B960 and Athlon II X2 215

Intel

Pentium B960

The Pentium B960 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,019 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Athlon II X2 215

The Athlon II X2 215 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium B960 and Athlon II X2 215 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Pentium B960 versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X2 215 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 215 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pentium B960 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium B960 scores 1,019 against the Athlon II X2 215's 1,011 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium B960. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 383 vs 274, a 33.2% lead for the Pentium B960 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 679 vs 674 (0.7% advantage for the Pentium B960). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B960 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 215.

FeaturePentium B960Athlon II X2 215
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,019
1,011
Geekbench 6 Single
383+40%
274
Geekbench 6 Multi
679
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium B960 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 215 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Pentium B960 versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 215 — the Athlon II X2 215 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium B960) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 215) — the Pentium B960 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76 (Pentium B960) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 215).

FeaturePentium B960Athlon II X2 215
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: not specified (Pentium B960) / true (Athlon II X2 215). The Pentium B960 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 215 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B960 targets Budget, Athlon II X2 215 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium B960 rivals AMD A8-3500M; Athlon II X2 215 rivals Pentium E5400.

FeaturePentium B960Athlon II X2 215
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Budget
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium B960 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 215 debuted at $45. At current prices ($15 vs $10), the Athlon II X2 215 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium B960 delivers 67.9 pts/$ vs 101.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 215 — making the Athlon II X2 215 the 39.2% better value option.

FeaturePentium B960Athlon II X2 215
MSRP
$134
$45-66%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$10-33%
Performance per Dollar
67.9
101.1+49%
Release Date
2011
2009