Pentium B960
VS
Pentium J2850

Pentium B960 vs Pentium J2850

Intel

Pentium B960

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium J2850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium B960 is positioned at rank 1144 and the Pentium J2850 is on rank 1057, so the Pentium J2850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium B960

#1132
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3861%
#1133
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3804%
#1134
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3492%
#1135
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3476%
#1136
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3444%
#1138
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3326%
#1139
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3189%
#1140
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3184%
#1141
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3099%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
99%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
99%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
98%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
97%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
97%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
95%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
95%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
94%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium J2850

#1045
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2714%
#1046
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2674%
#1047
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2455%
#1048
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2444%
#1049
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2422%
#1051
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2339%
#1052
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2242%
#1053
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2239%
#1054
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2179%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
100%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
100%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
99%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
98%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
97%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
97%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium J2850 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium B960 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium B960Pentium J2850
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($94)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium B960 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 84% cheaper ($15 vs $94) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium B960Pentium J2850
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+529%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($94)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium B960 and Pentium J2850

Intel

Pentium B960

The Pentium B960 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,019 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

Processing Power

The Pentium B960 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Pentium B960 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Pentium J2850 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Pentium B960 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium B960 scores 1,019 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium B960. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Pentium B960 vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium J2850.

FeaturePentium B960Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.41 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,019
1,016
Geekbench 6 Single
383
Geekbench 6 Multi
679
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium B960 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium B960Pentium J2850
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

The Pentium B960 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium J2850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium B960 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium B960 rivals AMD A8-3500M.

FeaturePentium B960Pentium J2850
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium B960 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Pentium J2850 debuted at $94. At current prices ($15 vs $94), the Pentium B960 is $79 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium B960 delivers 67.9 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Pentium J2850 — making the Pentium B960 the 145.1% better value option.

FeaturePentium B960Pentium J2850
MSRP
$134
$94-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-84%
$94
Performance per Dollar
67.9+529%
10.8
Release Date
2011
2013