Pentium D 915
VS
Celeron N3010

Pentium D 915 vs Celeron N3010

Intel

Pentium D 915

2 Cores2 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Celeron N3010

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium D 915 is positioned at rank 1002 and the Celeron N3010 is on rank 1164, so the Pentium D 915 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium D 915

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
32709%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
30907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
22441%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6760%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5355%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4685%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2683%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2648%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2411%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2411%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2384%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2320%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2287%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2278%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2257%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
100%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
99%
#1004
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
98%
#1005
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
98%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
97%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
97%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
96%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
96%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
95%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
94%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
94%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
93%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
93%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3010

#1152
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4271%
#1153
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4208%
#1154
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3863%
#1155
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3846%
#1156
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3810%
#1158
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3680%
#1159
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3528%
#1160
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3523%
#1161
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3428%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1168
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
99%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
97%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
95%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
95%
#1178
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
95%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3010 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium D 915Celeron N3010
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium D 915 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium D 915Celeron N3010
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+926%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium D 915 and Celeron N3010

Intel

Pentium D 915

The Pentium D 915 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $74.

Intel

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium D 915 and Celeron N3010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 915 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium D 915 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.04 GHz). The Pentium D 915 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N3010 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium D 915 scores 705 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 4.2% lead for the Celeron N3010. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium D 915Celeron N3010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+25%
2.24 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+169%
1.04 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
1 MB
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Airmont (2016)
PassMark
705
735+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium D 915 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium D 915Celeron N3010
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium D 915) / true (Celeron N3010). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium D 915 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile.

FeaturePentium D 915Celeron N3010
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 400
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Budget Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium D 915 launched at $74 MSRP, while the Celeron N3010 debuted at $107.

FeaturePentium D 915Celeron N3010
MSRP
$74-31%
$107
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Release Date
2006
2016