Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180

Intel

Pentium D 950

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Pentium D 950

2006

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (935 vs 938).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 11.2 PassMark/$ ($637 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
    • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

    Pentium Dual-Core E2180

    2007

    Why buy it

    • +0.3% higher PassMark.
    • Costs $553 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $637 MSRP).
    • Delivers 660.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 1.5 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $637 MSRP).
    • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2180 better than Pentium D 950?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium D 950 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2180 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2180 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium Dual-Core E2180 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2180 comes in $553 cheaper on MSRP at $84 MSRP versus $637 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium D 950 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 660.8% better value on MSRP (11.2 vs 1.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium Dual-Core E2180 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Pentium D 950 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2180 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Pentium D 950

    The Pentium D 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 January 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 935 points. Launch price was $637.

    Intel

    Pentium Dual-Core E2180

    The Pentium Dual-Core E2180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 938 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Pentium D 950 and Pentium Dual-Core E2180 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Pentium D 950 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2180 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Pentium D 950. Both are built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Pentium D 950 scores 935 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2180's 938 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2180. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeaturePentium D 950Pentium Dual-Core E2180
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    3.4 GHz+70%
    2 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (total)+100%
    1 MB (total)
    Process
    65 nm
    65 nm
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    935
    938
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1.

    FeaturePentium D 950Pentium Dual-Core E2180
    Socket
    LGA775
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Pentium D 950 was priced at $637, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2180 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($637 vs $84), Pentium Dual-Core E2180 was $553 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium D 950 delivers 1.5 pts/$ vs 11.2 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2180 — making the Pentium Dual-Core E2180 the 153.5% better value option.

    FeaturePentium D 950Pentium Dual-Core E2180
    MSRP
    $637
    $84-87%
    Performance per Dollar
    1.5
    11.2+647%
    Release Date
    2006
    2007

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.