Pentium Dual-Core E2200 vs E2-3000

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2 / 2

985

0.0%

990

+0.5%

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is positioned at rank 999 and the E2-3000 is on rank 946, so the E2-3000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual-Core E2200

#1

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

31646%

#2

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

29903%

#3

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

21712%

#4

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

6541%

#5

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

5181%

#6

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

4532%

#7

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

2596%

#8

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

2562%

#9

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

2333%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

2333%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

2306%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

2244%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

2213%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

2204%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

2184%

#999

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#1001

Core 2 Duo E4400

MSRP: $113|Avg: $20

98%

#1002

Pentium D 915

MSRP: $74|Avg: $10

97%

#1003

Core 2 Quad Q9400

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

96%

#1004

Celeron 450

MSRP: $53|Avg: $5

95%

#1005

Core i5-655K

MSRP: $216|Avg: $55

95%

#1006

Core 2 Duo E4600

MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6

94%

#1008

Core i7-870S

MSRP: $300|Avg: $80

94%

#1009

Core 2 Duo E6540

MSRP: $163|Avg: $15

93%

#1010

Celeron 430

MSRP: $49|Avg: $10

93%

#1011

Athlon X2 BE-2300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $80

92%

#1012

Core i7-875K

MSRP: $353|Avg: $175

91%

#1013

Core i5-670

MSRP: $284|Avg: $100

91%

#1014

Core i5-680

MSRP: $294|Avg: $10

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-3000

#933

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1778%

#934

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1752%

#935

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1608%

#936

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1601%

#937

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1587%

#939

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1532%

#940

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1469%

#941

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1467%

#942

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1427%

#946

E2-3000

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#947

A8-8600P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#948

FX-9800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#950

Celeron 1020E

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

99%

#953

Core i7-5850EQ

MSRP: $435|Avg: $370

98%

#955

Core i7-4810MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

97%

#958

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

97%

#959

Celeron 4305UE

MSRP: $107|Avg: $107

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E2-3000 (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Pentium Dual-Core E2200	E2-3000
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($25)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Pentium Dual-Core E2200	E2-3000
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($25)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Benchmark Check

E2-3000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual-Core E2200 and E2-3000

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

E2-3000

The E2-3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 990 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 and E2-3000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 versus 1.65 GHz on the E2-3000 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2200. The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-3000 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 scores 985 against the E2-3000's 990 — a 0.5% lead for the E2-3000. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Pentium Dual-Core E2200	E2-3000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+33%	1.65 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1024 kB
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	985	990

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-3000 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.