Pentium Dual Core SU4100
VS
Celeron G555

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Celeron G555

Intel

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron G555

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is positioned at rank 1065 and the Celeron G555 is on rank 634, so the Celeron G555 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core SU4100

#1053
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2792%
#1054
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2751%
#1055
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2525%
#1056
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2514%
#1057
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2491%
#1059
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2405%
#1060
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2306%
#1061
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2303%
#1062
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2241%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
100%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
99%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1076
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
97%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G555

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11360%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10734%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7794%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2348%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1860%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1627%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
932%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
920%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
837%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
837%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
828%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
806%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
794%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
791%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
784%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
100%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
97%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
97%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G555 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 48% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron G555.
InsightPentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+48%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Celeron G555

Intel

Pentium Dual Core SU4100

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G555

The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Celeron G555 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 — a 70% clock advantage for the Celeron G555. The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G555 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 scores 1,409 against the Celeron G555's 1,427 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron G555.

FeaturePentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.7 GHz+108%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,409
1,427+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
398
Geekbench 6 Multi
742
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G555 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
Socket
BGA956
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100) / VT-x (Celeron G555). The Celeron G555 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.

FeaturePentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Celeron G555 debuted at $52. At current prices ($10 vs $15), the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 delivers 140.9 pts/$ vs 95.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G555 — making the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 the 38.8% better value option.

FeaturePentium Dual Core SU4100Celeron G555
MSRP
$134
$52-61%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-33%
$15
Performance per Dollar
140.9+48%
95.1
Release Date
2009
2012