Pentium Dual Core T2370
VS
A4-6250J

Pentium Dual Core T2370 vs A4-6250J

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2008
VS
AMD

A4-6250J

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T2370 is positioned at rank 1059 and the A4-6250J is on rank 643, so the A4-6250J offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T2370

#1047
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2750%
#1048
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2709%
#1049
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2487%
#1050
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2476%
#1051
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2453%
#1053
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2369%
#1054
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2272%
#1055
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2268%
#1056
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2207%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
100%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
99%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
98%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6250J

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10917%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7927%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2388%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1892%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1655%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
948%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
935%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
852%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
852%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
842%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
819%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
808%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
805%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
797%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
97%
#643
A4-6250J
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-6250J (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium Dual Core T2370A4-6250J
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T2370 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium Dual Core T2370A4-6250J
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T2370 and A4-6250J

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T2370

The Pentium Dual Core T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,601 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A4-6250J

The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Pentium Dual Core T2370 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A4-6250J offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.73 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 versus 2 GHz on the A4-6250J — a 14.5% clock advantage for the A4-6250J. The Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the A4-6250J uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T2370 scores 1,601 against the A4-6250J's 1,619 — a 1.1% lead for the A4-6250J.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2370A4-6250J
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.73 GHz
2 GHz+16%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
65 nm
28 nm-57%
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,601
1,619+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
208
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the A4-6250J uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 versus DDR3-1600 on the A4-6250J — the A4-6250J supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6250J supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Pentium Dual Core T2370) vs 1 (A4-6250J). PCIe lanes: 0 (Pentium Dual Core T2370) vs 8 (A4-6250J) — the A4-6250J offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2370A4-6250J
Socket
PGA478
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T2370) vs AMD-V (A4-6250J). The A4-6250J includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T2370 targets Mobile, A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T2370A4-6250J
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R3
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile
Entry Desktop