Pentium Dual Core T4200
VS
Celeron E3300

Pentium Dual Core T4200 vs Celeron E3300

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4200

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron E3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Dual Core T4200 is positioned at rank 1044 and the Celeron E3300 is on rank 724, so the Celeron E3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4200

#1032
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2554%
#1033
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2516%
#1034
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2310%
#1035
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2299%
#1036
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2278%
#1038
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2200%
#1039
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2110%
#1040
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2106%
#1041
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2050%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
97%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
96%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
95%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
94%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
94%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13494%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2209%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1933%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1107%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1092%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
995%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
995%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
984%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
957%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
944%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
940%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
931%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
100%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
100%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
100%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
99%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
99%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
98%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
97%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron E3300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium Dual Core T4200 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron E3300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($10 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Celeron E3300

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4200

The Pentium Dual Core T4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,149 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Dual Core T4200 and Celeron E3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4200 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300. The Pentium Dual Core T4200 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron E3300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Dual Core T4200 scores 1,149 against the Celeron E3300's 1,155 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron E3300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB (total)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,149
1,155
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Dual Core T4200 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron E3300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
Socket
P
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium Dual Core T4200) / VT-x (Celeron E3300). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium Dual Core T4200 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron E3300 debuted at $50. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron E3300 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium Dual Core T4200 delivers 114.9 pts/$ vs 115.5 pts/$ for the Celeron E3300 — making the Celeron E3300 the 0.5% better value option.

FeaturePentium Dual Core T4200Celeron E3300
MSRP
$100
$50-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
114.9
115.5
Release Date
2009
2009