Pentium E6500 vs Celeron 3755U

CPU

GPU

Pentium E6500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009

Celeron 3755U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Pentium E6500

2 / 2

1,175

0.0%

1,182

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium E6500 is positioned at rank 921 and the Celeron 3755U is on rank 348, so the Celeron 3755U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6500

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

22281%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

21054%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

15287%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

4605%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

3648%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

3191%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1828%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1804%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1642%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1642%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1624%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1580%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1558%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1552%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1538%

#302

Core i7-6900K

MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089

96%

#303

Core i7-5960X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $83

96%

#921

Pentium E6500

MSRP: $84|Avg: $10

100%

#922

Core i5-2500

MSRP: $294|Avg: $69

100%

#924

Athlon II X4 605e

MSRP: $143|Avg: $25

98%

#925

Athlon II X4 610e

MSRP: $143|Avg: $20

98%

#926

Core i5-2390T

MSRP: $182|Avg: $182

98%

#927

Phenom II X4 910e

MSRP: $157|Avg: $69

98%

#928

FX-8100

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

98%

#930

Celeron E1400

MSRP: $53|Avg: $63

96%

#932

Pentium E6800

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

96%

#933

Core i3-530

MSRP: $113|Avg: $15

96%

#935

Core i3-2105

MSRP: $138|Avg: $30

95%

#936

Athlon II X3 405e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3755U

#101

Core i5-1350P

MSRP: $320|Avg: $250

99%

#102

Core i3-1220P

MSRP: $250|Avg: $150

98%

#107

Core Ultra 5 228V

MSRP: $295|Avg: $295

97%

#336

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

496%

#337

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

489%

#338

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

449%

#339

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

447%

#340

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

443%

#342

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

428%

#343

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

410%

#344

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

409%

#345

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

398%

#348

Celeron 3755U

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3755U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Pentium E6500	Celeron 3755U
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium E6500 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Pentium E6500	Celeron 3755U
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Pentium E6500 Benchmark Check

Celeron 3755U Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium E6500 and Celeron 3755U

Pentium E6500

The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron 3755U

The Celeron 3755U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Pentium E6500 and Celeron 3755U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3755U — a 58.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 3755U (base: 2.93 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Pentium E6500 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 3755U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium E6500 scores 1,175 against the Celeron 3755U's 1,182 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 3755U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium E6500 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3755U.

Feature	Pentium E6500	Celeron 3755U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.93 GHz	1.7 GHz+83%
Base Clock	2.93 GHz+72%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	1,175	1,182
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	625

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium E6500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 3755U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Pentium E6500	Celeron 3755U
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium E6500) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U). The Celeron 3755U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium E6500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U.