Pentium G3420T
VS
Celeron M 575

Pentium G3420T vs Celeron M 575

Intel

Pentium G3420T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron M 575

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G3420T is positioned at rank 680 and the Celeron M 575 is on rank 827, so the Pentium G3420T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3420T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12229%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11555%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8390%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2528%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2002%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1751%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1003%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
990%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
901%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
901%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
891%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
867%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
855%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
852%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
844%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
100%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
97%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
97%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
97%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
97%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 575

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1316%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1297%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1191%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1185%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1174%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1134%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1087%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1086%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1057%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#828
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#834
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#835
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium G3420T leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M 575 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium G3420TCeleron M 575
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($12)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron M 575 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 70% cheaper ($12 vs $40) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium G3420TCeleron M 575
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+234%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($12)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G3420T and Celeron M 575

Intel

Pentium G3420T

The Pentium G3420T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,912 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Celeron M 575

The Celeron M 575 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Pentium G3420T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 575 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium G3420T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Pentium G3420T versus 2 GHz on the Celeron M 575 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G3420T. The Pentium G3420T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 575 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3420T scores 1,912 against the Celeron M 575's 1,917 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron M 575.

FeaturePentium G3420TCeleron M 575
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,912
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3420T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 575 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G3420T versus 800 on the Celeron M 575 — the Celeron M 575 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G3420T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium G3420T) vs 0 (Celeron M 575) — the Pentium G3420T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1150 (Pentium G3420T) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron M 575).

FeaturePentium G3420TCeleron M 575
Socket
LGA1150
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
800+26567%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+838860700%
4
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G3420T) vs false (Celeron M 575). The Pentium G3420T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 575 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron M 575 rivals Mobile Sempron SI-40.

FeaturePentium G3420TCeleron M 575
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
false
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium G3420T launched at $75 MSRP, while the Celeron M 575 debuted at $86. At current prices ($40 vs $12), the Celeron M 575 is $28 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3420T delivers 47.8 pts/$ vs 159.8 pts/$ for the Celeron M 575 — making the Celeron M 575 the 107.9% better value option.

FeaturePentium G3420TCeleron M 575
MSRP
$75-13%
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$12-70%
Performance per Dollar
47.8
159.8+234%
Release Date
2013
2008