Pentium G3460
VS
Celeron M 900

Pentium G3460 vs Celeron M 900

Intel

Pentium G3460

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G3460 is positioned at rank 913 and the Celeron M 900 is on rank 797, so the Celeron M 900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21967%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20757%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15071%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4540%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3596%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3146%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1802%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1778%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1619%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1619%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1601%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1558%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1536%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1530%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1516%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
100%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
100%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
96%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
96%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900

#785
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1201%
#786
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1183%
#787
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1086%
#788
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1081%
#789
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1072%
#791
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1035%
#792
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
992%
#793
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
991%
#794
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
964%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium G3460 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 900 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium G3460Celeron M 900
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron M 900 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 148% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Pentium G3460.
InsightPentium G3460Celeron M 900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+148%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G3460 and Celeron M 900

Intel

Pentium G3460

The Pentium G3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $89.

Intel

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Pentium G3460 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 900 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Pentium G3460 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G3460 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Pentium G3460. The Pentium G3460 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 900 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G3460 scores 2,114 against the Celeron M 900's 2,101 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G3460.

FeaturePentium G3460Celeron M 900
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+59%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,114
2,101
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G3460 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium G3460Celeron M 900
Socket
LGA1150
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium G3460 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Celeron M 900 debuted at $86. At current prices ($25 vs $10), the Celeron M 900 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium G3460 delivers 84.6 pts/$ vs 210.1 pts/$ for the Celeron M 900 — making the Celeron M 900 the 85.2% better value option.

FeaturePentium G3460Celeron M 900
MSRP
$149
$86-42%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$10-60%
Performance per Dollar
84.6
210.1+148%
Release Date
2014
2009
Pentium G3460 vs Celeron M 900