Pentium G640T
VS
A4-3300

Pentium G640T vs A4-3300

Intel

Pentium G640T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A4-3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium G640T is positioned at rank 848 and the A4-3300 is on rank 814, so the A4-3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G640T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17512%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16547%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12015%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3619%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2867%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2508%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1437%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1418%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1291%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1291%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1276%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1242%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1225%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1220%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1209%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
100%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
100%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
98%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
97%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
97%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
97%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15461%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11226%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3382%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2679%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2344%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1342%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1325%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1206%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1206%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1193%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1160%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1144%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1140%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1129%
#814
A4-3300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#815
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
100%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
97%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
97%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-3300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium G640T in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPentium G640TA4-3300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPentium G640TA4-3300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium G640T and A4-3300

Intel

Pentium G640T

The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A4-3300

The A4-3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,143 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium G640T and A4-3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T versus 2.5 GHz on the A4-3300 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the A4-3300 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Pentium G640T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-3300 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium G640T scores 1,139 against the A4-3300's 1,143 — a 0.4% lead for the A4-3300. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T vs 0 kB on the A4-3300.

FeaturePentium G640TA4-3300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
1,139
1,143
Geekbench 6 Single
266
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium G640T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-3300 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium G640TA4-3300
Socket
LGA1155
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium G640T) / AMD-V (A4-3300). The A4-3300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6410D), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3300 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3300 rivals Celeron G530.

FeaturePentium G640TA4-3300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6410D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop